Global Union 
There is a need for an international organization for handling the business 
 of the globalization of the project management profession.  
The GPMF Country Reports advocate the need for an international project management 
 organization. The "Country Reports" see a need for a body operating 
 at the international level to calibrate and coordinate the professional standards 
 of different and national project management societies. Perhaps a formalization 
 of the GPMF is needed to provide opportunities "to meet, learn, expand and 
 understand different needs" on a regular basis.  
There are two existing models for an international project management organization. 
 These are:  
 - The European-based IPMA and 
 
 - The PMI National Organization Unit (NOU) 
 
 
The IPMA is an association of equal national organizations. It is not in the 
 business of recruiting individual members. PMI exists primarily as a professional 
 society for its members. The UK Association for Project Management and other 
 IPMA national societies do the same.  
PMI comprises both regional chapters and national societies. IPMA is not like 
 PMI. IPMA comprises national project management societies. Its mission is to 
 promote project management through collaboration and coordination of the national 
 association's activities. The PMI National Organization Unit is a collection 
 of "off shore" PMI Chapters grouped into a national entity but remaining 
 subject to the policies of PMI and "the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 
 and the United States of America" (a direct quote from the PMI Constitution).  
 
The window of opportunity for global union is open but national societies should 
 strive to be the voice of project management at the level at which national societies 
 really belong, the national level. We must keep the distinction between an international 
 project management coordinating body and national awarding bodies.  
Where national organizations do not exist then every effort should be made 
 to support and ensure the development of a national and sovereign project management 
 organization. This is the best route to a long term development of the project 
 management discipline. We must avoid the development of national organizations 
 subject to foreign country laws and policy.  
 
 
 |