| In this Part 1 of our two-part paper we will introduce 
the PRINCE2 project management methodology, the book's structure and what we liked. 
In Part 2 we'll cover some special concepts specific to PRINCE2, 
some of the downsides we see from our perspective, and we'll finish with our summary 
conclusions. IntroductionFor those not familiar with this book, the Office of Government Commerce (OGC, 
UK) publishes Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. It is a prescriptive 
manual describing in detail a structured method for the effective management of a 
project. The latest version contains 456 pages, a 12% increase over its 2002 predecessor. 
PRINCE2 is a widely recognized de facto standard used extensively by governments and 
the private sector in the UK and around the world, see Figure 1.  
 Figure 1
 The widespread use of PRINCE2 owes much to the fact that it can be tailored and 
scaled to all manner of projects and situations. According to the APM Group:[1]  
It has become an international standard, with organizations around the world using 
it as their preferred approach to managing projects. This is reflected in the fact 
that:  
 
The PRINCE2 Manual is currently available in English, Danish and Mandarin Chinese, 
and is being translated into Dutch, French, German, Polish and SpanishThe PRINCE2 Pocketbook has been translated into Italian and is currently being 
translated into French and GermanThe PRINCE2 Glossary of Terms is available in English, Arabic, Bulgarian, Danish, 
Dutch, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Russian, Polish, 
Spanish and Vietnamese. The method was first promulgated around 1989 and has since gone through a number 
of incarnations. We last reviewed PRINCE2 in some detail in its 2002 Edition back 
in November 2002 - see http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/comparing/intro.htm. 
However, we did so to draw a comparison with the Project Management Institute's Guide 
to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Since then, the Guide has been updated to its third revision (2004) and PRINCE2 
was updated to its latest revision last year. We reviewed the 2004 version of the 
Guide in considerable depth in papers from March to May 2005 - see http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/pmbok3/intro.htm. 
Moreover, the team leader of the latest PRINCE2 update, Colin Bentley, has written 
his own comparison between the latest versions of the two documents - see http://www.maxwideman.com/guests/prince-pmbok/note.htm. 
So now we feel it is appropriate to examine the latest version of PRINCE2, in its 
own right. "PRINCE" stands for PRojects IN Controlled Environments 
and is described as a structured method for effective project management. It is based 
on the experiences of scores of projects, project managers and project team who have 
contributed, some from their mistakes or omissions, others from their successes.[2] 
According to the Foreword, it is recognized as a world-class international product 
and is the standard method for project management, not least because it embodies many 
years of good practice in project management and provides a flexible and adaptable 
approach to suit all projects.[3] The manual itself is limited in its scope first because it draws a distinction 
between "product life span" and "project life cycle" as shown in Figure 
2. From the manual's perspective, the latter is only a small part of the former 
and consequently only covers the execution period of the project. This is so even 
though the "Business Case drives all the project management processes, from initial 
project set-up through to successful finish",[4] 
it, together with the development of the solution to the need and intermediate-level 
planning, are not included under the terms of the manual. It may be concluded that, 
in PRINCE2's view, the project does not start until the earlier work, including any 
feasibility studies, and so on, actually move into formal and physical execution. Figure 2: The product life span and project life cycle ranges in PRINCE2[5]For direction on managing the earlier parts of a project, or "pre-project" in PRINCE2 
terms, you must refer to a companion document, Managing Successful Programmes 
(MSP), also published by OGC. We reviewed this document in March 2006 - see http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/successful/intro.htm. 
As the MSP name implies, this volume is focused on managing collections of projects 
such as "Making and delivering"; "Organizational Change"; and "External societal change" 
projects. That means that the "front end" of these projects do not receive dedicated 
attention as they tend to do in North America, but rather as a part of, and in competition 
with, any and all other projects that are being contemplated. Second, as it says in the text, "PRINCE2 assumes that the project is run within 
the context of a contract".[6] This statement 
is made in the discussion of purchasing so it obviously contemplates a legal contract. 
However, elsewhere there seems to be some ambivalence over this, where the context 
suggests the possibility of an "internal" commitment between divisions of a large 
organization. In short, the methodology does not appear to be suited to the large 
number of relatively modest in-house IS/IT projects in corporate IT departments. Third, the general tone of the content suggests application to projects of significant 
value or complexity conducted under rigorous conditions of "high ceremony". These 
are projects such as you may find in governments at all levels, the process industries, 
engineering and construction companies, and the like. Indeed, PRINCE2 observes that: 
"Without a project management method, projects are rarely completed on time and within 
acceptable cost - and this is especially true of large projects.[7] 
However, PRINCE2 does say: "tailoring the method to suit the circumstances of a particular 
project is critical to its successful use."[8] 
In fact, where applicable, the standard format of the process descriptions includes 
a comment on "scalability". 1. Embedding Best Practice, The APM Group Ltd, UK, June 2006
 2. PRINCE2, 2005 Edition, Office of government Commerce, UK, 2005, p1
 3. Ibid, p v
 4. Ibid
 5. Ibid, Figure 2.1, p8
 6. Ibid, p8
 7. Ibid, p2
 8. Ibid, p9
 
 |