| Information How and where to get itInformation is the first crucial component in negotiating because it is a big 
advantage to learn what the other side really wants, their limits and their deadlines. 
However, information is recognized as power, especially in situations where one 
side does not particularly trust the other. Consequently, it is often common strategy 
for one or both sides to conceal their true interests, their needs and priorities. 
So often we see that serious negotiations only get under way after sufficient 
pressure has built up "in the system" so to speak. Obtaining information under these conditions, especially from an experienced 
negotiator in an adversarial situation, presents enormous difficulties. The chance 
of getting key information at this stage is very remote. So, the key is to start 
early because the earlier the start the lower the stress levels and the easier 
it is for information to be gathered. Once stress levels have risen in an acknowledged 
formal confrontation, attitudes become solidified, defensive and closed. Some people assume that the more intimidating or flawless they appear to others, 
  the more they will learn. Actually the opposite is true. The best approach is 
  to quietly and persistently probe for information, not like a grand inquisitor 
  but rather as a humble human being seeking genuine advice. The more apparently 
  confused and defenseless the approach, the more the respondents are inclined 
  to help, especially with information and advice. With this approach too, it 
  is easier to listen more than talk, to ask questions rather than give answers. 
  In fact, you should ask questions even when you know the answer because this 
  way you can test the credibility of the other side. Who are the best sources of information? Anyone who works with or for the other 
side, anyone who has dealt with them in the past, or third parties and even competitors. 
This includes secretaries, clerks, engineers, janitors, spouses, technicians or 
past customers and suppliers. They will typically be willing to respond if approached 
in a non-threatening way. Is there more to it?In most instances, there is more to gathering information than just described. 
It may be necessary to give information in order to get some in return. Perceptive 
people will not communicate with you beyond the chit chat level until reciprocal 
risks are established. That is, until you share commensurate information with 
them. However, by giving carefully worded and controlled information during this 
stage, you may be able to lower the expectation level of the other side. Conversely, if you introduce new information late in the negotiation you may 
stall the proceedings because of the element of surprise. Instead, by introducing 
the same issue early and then raising it several more times at adroitly spaced 
intervals, it becomes familiar to the other side. As it becomes familiar, it somehow 
becomes more acceptable. Remember that change and new ideas are only acceptable when presented slowly 
in bite sized fragments. Keep that in mind when trying to alter someone's viewpoint, 
thinking, perceptions and expectations. For most people it's easier and more comfortable 
to stay in a familiar groove. When it finally comes to the negotiating event, practice effective listening 
  techniques. By carefully concentrating on what's going on it is possible to 
  learn a lot about what the other side is really feeling, their motivation and 
  their real needs. Of course attentive listening and observation mean not just 
  hearing what is being said, but also understanding what is not being said. Study the body languageThe study and interpretation of body language and related cues has become very 
popular in recent years. A cue is a message sent indirectly, whose meaning may 
be ambiguous and require interpretation. Essentially these fall into three basic 
categories:  
Unintentional cues, in which behaviors 
or words transmit an inadvertent message. For example a Freudian slipVerbal cues, in which the voice, intonation 
or emphasis, sends a message that seems to contradict the words being spokenBehavioral cues, body language displayed 
by posture, facial expressions, eye contact, hand gestures, where a person sits 
at a conference table, who nudges whom or who pats whom on the shoulder, and so 
on. In our culture pattors seem to have more power than pattees! The interpretation of much body language is obvious, but beware of ascribing 
some universal meaning to an isolated gesture, without taking the circumstances 
into account. How can we apply all this to a negotiating situation? The key information that 
any negotiator would like to have about the other side is their real limits, just 
how much they will sacrifice to make this deal. In other words, what is the lowest 
price the seller will sell for? Or, what is the absolute top figure that the buyer 
will pay? You may be able to determine this by carefully observing the other side's 
pattern of concession behavior.  
 |