|  
 
  
 | Aaron J. Shenhar, Professor of Technology 
  Management, James J. Renier Visiting Chair, Center for the Development 
  of Technological Leadership, University of Minnesota, MN and R. Max Wideman
 This paper is the first of a series of six papers describing the search for 
  a best practices linkage from project classification through management style 
  to project success. It represent part of the research conducted between 1992 
  and 1998. This paper was presented to an INFORMS Conference in Washington, DC, 
  in May, 1996, and briefly reviews the genesis of modern project management and 
  its scope in today's business and technical environment.
 Published here December, 2001. |  | 
 
| ConclusionProject management is not new, although our understanding of it, and its application 
 to a much broader range of project types may be. In fact the seeds of project 
 management theory and practice were sown over a thousand year ago. Two simple 
 philosophies state that success depends on preparation, and preparation must 
 address the issues of doing the right thing, while the focus of the subsequent 
 production is on doing the things right. However, project management is more than just planning and doing. Modern project 
 management encompasses managing as many as five primary areas including: the 
 project's external and internal environments; its life cycle; integration/interfacing/configuration 
 through reliable information; control processes; and success through effective 
 communication. Projects may be classified according to a two-dimensional typology of three 
 levels of program/project scope versus four general levels of technology content. 
 It is suggested that this form of classification provides broad guidance to the 
 relative and respective levels of project process management and project technical 
 management required for the project 
              FICE, FEIC, FCSCE, FPMI
 © 1996, 2001
 
 
 |  |